Marbury vs. Madison :: essays research papers

In the unconditional Court case of George Reynolds vs. unite States, 1879, concerned an older Mormon living in the Utah district under national honors, was charged with a violation of a federal law forbidding trades union in all federal territories. The practice session of multiple marriage couples is a practice common among Mormons of that time period. The joined States put into effect a law the keeped multiple marriage couples upon receiving word that Mormons were moving into the Utah Territory. Since the United States Government was founded on Judeo-Christian beliefs, they frowned heavily on the Mormon practice and used their power to restrict their ability to act on their beliefs. The principle of democracy that is directly applicable to this situation is Equality under the Law. George Reynolds took his case to the Supreme Court in objection that he could non fully pursue his piety. He argued that the starting amendment guarantees that persons will be free from any la w prohibiting the free class period of religion. That no federal law could interfere with a persons religious belief or with actions based on those beliefs. That the federal law was unconstitutional and his conviction should be overturned. In his eyes he was not being treated fairly by the government because of what his religion believed was acceptable. He felt that multiple partner relationships should be allowed and that the United States was out of job in restricting that. The Supreme Court ruled that the case presented an intelligible and compelling need to pose a question of behavior repellant to public will. The first amendment cannot be used as a bulwark to protect any person against criminal behavior. This ruling states that the first amendment cannot be used as an excuse to do whatever you want exactly because your religion says thats ok to do. Mr. Reynolds is allowed to believe that multiple partners are acceptable, scarce he is not allowed to practice that belief, according to the law of the United States. The Supreme Court ruling was quite inaccurate in that they think Mormon beliefs are wrong because they differ from their own beliefs. Because Mormon religion is a minority in this country, the rest of the United States feels that they have the right to regulate how the Mormon religion can and cannot be practiced. Mormons should be allowed to pursue their religion to the fullest extent without causing harm to himself or herself or any another(prenominal) individual.