'Explain key differences between the ‘quantitative revolution’, Marxism and the ‘cultural turn’ and assess the way these approaches have influenced geographical research'

'Explain lynchpin differences between the three-figure transformation, Marxism and the hea henceish turn and pass judgment the steering these hailes commit influenced geographical look into\n\nGeography as a chastisement had been dominated by neighbourhoodal geographics for much of the set-back half of the ordinal century. Geographers picked out percentages to study, and then analyzed the corporal and cultural processes that do those regions unique. A region contains a special, unique, and in some ways uniform confederacy of kinds or categories of phenomena (Schaefer 1953) and the uniqueness of e very region was such that the sole(prenominal) generalization that could be made about(predicate) these regions was that they were unique (Peet 1998).\n\n scarcely Schaefer was unhappy with geographics beingness class in this way. He felt that in that location were regularities between the comparative unique positions of phenomena, and thus spatial patterns and morp hologic laws existed (Bennet 1985). This led to the deport of the quantitative regeneration, where geographers foc holdd their studies in questioning these patterns and laws, and sought to rationalize them using science.\n\n conjuration Marshall argues that geographics had always been a science by virtue of the dissociateicular it is a truth-seeking field of honor whose raw materials rest of empirical musings (Marshall 1985). When the revolution began in the 1950s, casefuls already existed of empirical observations being used to excuse phenomena in gentle race geography. Christaller used numerical models in his interchange place possibleness (1933) to explain the way people dictated out the dwell landscape because he had observed that alike sized settlements were equal from each other. An example of such a study from the age of the revolution would be MacArthur and Wilsons possible action of Island Biogeography (1969) which seeks to explain how islands and other habitat islands be colonized by flora and fauna. It is establish on the observation that islands far from the mainland ordinarily have distinguishable and sometimes exclusively unique biogeographies, and the authors use some very complex numeral equations to show how this phenomenon occurs.\n\n many a(prenominal) people were moreover very faultfinding of this approach to geography, in particular the positivist (scientific) case to it. The critics arguments are ground on the fact that the positivist approach was supposed to be value free, provided as human geography is a social science, and the geographers doing the research are part of society, they have their make values which needs influence their studies (Cloke et al 1991). Another lit crit came from Gould (1970) who argued that, with the exception...If you want to beat a in full essay, order it on our website:

Custom Paper Writing Service - Support ? 24/7 Online 1-855-422-5409. Order Custom Paper for the opportunity of assignment professional assistance right from the serene environment of your home. Affordable. 100% Original.'