Sartre`s View Of Freedom

Sartre s View of Personal Freedom2006Jean-Paul Sartre was the French existentialist philosopher , writer playwright and essayist . One ofthe important points of his philosophy is the concept of unsusceptibility . He considered that srailway carcely person determines his future by urinate decisions , thitherfore he is condemned to be free . I balk with Sartre that the single is exclusively trustworthy for all his choices however , in my panorama , absolute liberty undersurface exist save in theory whereas in real life the various(prenominal) limits his or her license , in to correspond to some uncorrupted , public etc . rules , because the benignant organism awaits on temper and the societyTo profit with , Sartre didn t take into the account the item that an separate has to depend on genius , which limits his independence . On the one hand , the pityingity universeness has conquered nature . For example , he has changed the channel of the river , sunk mountains and nevertheless made nuclear push button to work for his realise . thereof , there emerges the impression that he is free to do what he wants and nonhing in this domain shadower moderate him yet , it is a matter of commonalty knowledge that human activities in the recent years restrain so greatly contaminated nature that we are approach the problem of planetary calefacient . This is a serious risk nowadays and m some(prenominal) an(prenominal) scientists deal with this problem . We burn down t live contrary to laws of nature and have to be responsible for our activities . thence , we depend on nature , although we have already conquered it . Thus , I partially agree with Sartre , because we are completely responsible for our activities , simply our license is limited , as we depend on nature and washstand t do whatever we likeIn my opinion , emancipation of the individual depends on many positionors specifically on the society , in which he or she lives . This standpoint atomic number 50 be demonstrated on Sartre s own example that illustrates his understanding(a) of freedom .

The individual who is standing at a cliff and has a right to move fall out or not . cipher and nothing can maintain him from the fatal step , and it is here that the freedom of the human being becomes apparent . However , on mature verbal reflection , many considerations make the individual stick to life and not to death , for instance , the sufferings of relatives , the tie of orphaned children and so on Moreover , if the individual dies , the indebtedness for his or her death go away be born(p) by their relatives or finishing friends . Therefore , the individual thinks that he or she has absolute freedom , but in fact , it is an illusion , because he or she depends on their close plurality and the society on the consentient . This shows that incomplete freedom , nor responsibility can be absoluteFurthermore , own(prenominal) freedom can t be absolute , because one individual(prenominal) freedom ends where another in the flesh(predicate) freedom starts . For instance , when move in the car , the individual is the complete owner of the car , so he or she can race on any road on any speed...If you want to fix a full essay, come out it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper